Gabitril as Anxiety Treatment Peer Reviewed Trials Report

Open up access peer-reviewed chapter

Treatment Resistant Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Submitted: November 25th, 2010 Reviewed: Apr 12th, 2011 Published: September 12th, 2011

DOI: x.5772/23255

one. Introduction

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition Text-Revision (DSM-Four-TR) section on anxiety disorders includes several major disorders: generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), panic disorder, specific phobia, social anxiety disorder (Lamentable), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (DSM-IV-TR, 2000). Anxiety disorders are the most prevalent of all psychiatric disorders, with an estimated prevalence of 2% to 18% worldwide (Wittchen & Jacobi, 2005). Specific phobias accept a lifetime prevalence of 12.five%; the lifetime prevalence for GAD, OCD, panic disorder, Lamentable, and PTSD are five.7%, i.vi%, iv.vii%, 12.one%, and 6.8%, respectively ( Kessler et al., 2005 ).

Anxiety disorders mostly begin at an early historic period, significantly impair multiple areas of development and life, and are associated with numerous adverse consequences such as school failure, unemployment and underemployment, academic underachievement, interactional and marital problems, and excessive use of health intendance facilities (Demyttenaere et al., 2004; Wittchen & Jacobi, 2005). Although anxiety disorders are highly treatable disease the majority of the patients are underdiagnosed or exercise not receive acceptable treatment.

The goal for the handling of Anxiety disorders is achieving and sustaining remission complete resolution of symptoms and restoration of presymptomatic functioning level. However, a significant number of patients do not fully answer to an adequate trial of beginning line treatment with an serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs). For example, at least forty% to 60% of OCD patients even so showroom symptoms afterward treatment (Pallanti & Quercioli, 2006).

SRIs are currently the first-line pharmacotherapy for nigh anxiety disorders (Demyttenaere et al., 2004). Benzodiazepines are widely used for panic disorder, GAD, and Sad, merely they are associated with unwanted cognitive side effects, a withdrawal syndrome, and potential for abuse. Apply of tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors is limited by their adverse side effect profiles. There are as well new drugs that alter the γ-aminobutyric acrid (GABA)-ergic, serotonergic, and glutamatergic receptor complexes and established drugs with anxiolytic properties such as antipsychotics and anticonvulsants. Approximately a few of the patients who receive treatment are fully symptomatic remitted (Wittchen & Jacobi, 2005; Craske et al., 2005).

Even in those who had response to handling, remission cannot be accomplished. There is no consensus on the operationalization of response, fractional response, remission for each anxiety disorder (Ballenger, 2001). It remains important also to develop consensus on different levels of non response ranging from failure answer to offset line therapy to failure answer to circuitous procedures. The best definition for treatment resistance is still inadequate (Pallanti et al., 2002). A treatment-resistant patient could be divers as a patient who had a standard treatment with at least 2 antidepressants for a minimum of 6 weeks without response (Bandelow & Rüther, 2004).

This affiliate presents a review of the current literature and issues related to GAD including definitions of response and remission, outcome measures and handling strategies for handling-resistant GAD.

Advertisement

2. Neurobiology of Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)

Kessler and colleagues surveyed 5001 subjects and demonstrated that GAD and major depression are most likely to occur in the same year and this finding suggests that the disorders are probably linked in biologically, but certainly phenomenologically.(Kessler & Gruber 2008). The extensive overlap betwixt depression and anxiety means that studying the neurobiology of GAD means also studying the neurobiology of low. There is a variety of testify implicating the dysfunction of GABA, noradrenergic and serotonerjic systems in the expression of GAD. (Ballenger,2001;Gorman and Hirschfeld, 2002).

Of all of the anxiety disorders, GAD has probably been the to the lowest degree well studied from a genetic perspective. In a contempo report of more than 37000 twins from aforementioned-sex pairs examined the genetic interrelation among GAD, MDD, and neuroticism. The genetic correlation between major depression and GAD was very high, suggesting that the same genes influence major depression and GAD. The conclusion is that, genetically, MDD and GAD are strongly related and take a common connexion to the personality trait neuroticism.(Kendler & Gardner, 2007)

Hettema and colleagues studied 2 subtypes of GAD genes, GAD1 and GAD2, and determined that variations in GAD1 business relationship for a minor proportion of the individual differences in neuroticism and may increment susceptibility for MDD and feet disorders. These preliminary findings are exciting, but replication is needed. (Hettema & An, 2006).

In neuroimaging studies of GAD, Mathew and colleagues compared GAD patients and the controls, the GAD subjects had college ratios of N-acetylaspartate (NAA) to creatine in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.(Mathew & Mao, 2004) In an other report, compared with the healthy subjects, individuals with GAD had increased activation in the right ventrolateral prefrontan cortex when viewing angry faces. (Monk & Nelson, 2006)

Bachelor research has suggested that GAD is modestly heritable and shares substantial genetic variation with major depression and the personality trait neuroticism. Genetic clan studies are starting to place promising leads in the search for genes that may increment susceptibility to anxiety disorders. Neuroimaging studies in GAD suggest increased activity in the encephalon's fearfulness circuitry, as well equally increased activeness in the prefrontal cortex, which appears to accept a compansatory role in reducing GAD sypmtoms.

Advert

3. Cess of GAD: Epidemiology, presentation, diagnosis and course

In the DSM-4, the diagnostic features for GAD, include excessive anxiety and worry which is hard to control and pertains to several events or activities. GAD is characterized by persistent and excessive feet and worry nigh a number of common events or situations (eg, finances, wellness of self or family, job performance or security) occurring on more than days for vi months or more than (DSM-IV). The degree of anxiety is in excess of what would be considered reasonably warranted by the reality of the situation. Difficulty controlling worry is the cardinal feature of GAD and is associated with at least iii boosted symptoms from a listing including restlessness or tension, easy fatigability, difficulty concentrating, irritability, muscular tension and slumber disturbance. (APA 1980). There are some diagnostic difficulties similar high rates of comorbidity, confusion in defining the term "excessive" worry and duration requirement of 6 months. Because subthreshold cases that meet all GAD diagnostic criteria except for duration of symptoms has demostrated in researches, it is suggested that perhaps the elapsing requirement of 6 months should exist revised downward. ( Kessler & Brandenburg, 2005 ).

The main tool used in the clinical setting to assess the severity of symptoms of GAD is the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A).(Hamilton, 1959). However, the HAM-A isa 14-item, clinician-rated scale and is quite time consuming to perform. Recently, scales useful for all anxiety disorders as GAD accept been developed, such every bit the Anxiety Sensitivity Index, (ASI) b (Reiss et al 1986) Anxiety Sensitivity refers to a person's tendency to fear anxiety-related symptoms due to the belief that there will be some negative outcome as a issue of having those symptoms. the ASI is a widely used measure that has been translated into many languages. The validity and the reliability of the Turkish version was also studied and used in clinical researches. (Dilbaz 2005)

Generalized feet disorder (GAD) is a relatively common condition (lifetime prevalence 5.7%,and the 12-calendar month prevalence charge per unit was reported to be 3.i%) with chronic grade which is associated with suicidality, significant distress and disability. GAD is an adult onset disorder with an oldest median age ( estimated 31 years amidst Usa population) at onset of whatever feet disorder. Approximately 25% of cases of GAD have an age onset of 20 years and an additional 50% have an historic period at onset betwixt 20 and 47. ( Kessler & Berglund, 2005 ). Prevalance is higher among female gender,(twice as often in voman as information technology does in men), older age, white adults, widowed, separated or divorced with a depression income. (Grant & Hasin, 2005)

Individuals with GAD has a high gamble of recurrence. Harvard Enquiry Anxiety Disorders project (HARP) the probability of recovery was 0.58 and probability of recurrence among patients who had recovered was 0.45 over 12 years. Primary Care Feet Projection's probability of recovery was 0.39 over 2 years that is a some college than HARP study. Average corporeality of time that patients were sick during 12 years was %74 in HARP study. Comorbid Axis I disorders,(Bruce & Yonkers, 2005) substance use disorders, cluster C personality disorders(Yonkers &Dyck, 2000) and female gender(Yonkers & Bruce, 2003) accept been constitute to be less likely to remit.

Advertisement

4. GAD and medical affliction

Patients with GAD often have medical comorbidities such equally migraine, rheumatoid arthritis, peptic ulcer, irritable bowel syndrome, coronary heart disease, hiperthyroidism, diabetes, asthma and cronic obstructive pulmonary disease that may influence treatment choice. Activation of the HPA axis and sympathetic pathways can lead to cardiac and metabolik alteration and chronic activation of stres response may play a role in the vulnerability to chronic medical illnesses in inmay not be dividuals with GAD. (Habib & Gilt, 2002; Charney, 2004)

When treating patients with GAD and medical illness, GAD should be treated as an independent trouble. Controlling GAD may not but improve the patient'south quality of life, but may also improve the physical health which is mediated by the sympathetic nervous system and cortisol mechanism.

Advertizement

v. GAD and psychiatric comorbidities: Depression, bipolar disorder and substance abuse

GAD is often comorbid with several psychiatric disorders. 90% have likelihood of at least ane psyhiatric disorder in their lifetime, 62.4% had a lifetime history of major depression, 37.6 % had a lifetime history of alcohol and substance use disorder and 23.5% to 35.1% had at least one other anxiety disorder. The highest comorbidities were major depressive disorder (MDD) and dysthymia, while booze abuse, social feet disorder were also common ( (Wittchen & Hoyer, 2001).

Comorbidity may complicate the diagnosis, handling and outcome, resulting with greater disability and impairment. (Wittchen & Hoyer, 2001; Goodwin & Gorman, 2002). In a contempo meta-analysis information technology is compared the impact of pure GAD and GAD comorbide depression on functioning and quality of life. Because patients with comorbidity has more than impairment overall, information technology is suggested that clinicians should use clinical interview structured to diagnose for the presence of comorbid conditions. (Hoffman & Dukes, 2008) The presence of feet comorbidity in patients with MDD has besides been demonstrated to interfere with the handling response in Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Salve Low (STAR*D) report which eveluated 2,876 outpatients. Those who take comorbide anxiety and were given first-line pharmacotherapy treatment with citalopram had significantly lower remission rates (%22 versus %33) according to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. (Fava & Blitz, 2008)

Every bit with MDD, anxiety comorbidity tin can worsen the course of bipolar disorder, having a greater lifetime risk of suicide attempts ( with current GAD comorbidity it is reported %62; with lifetime GAD, %53) and greater chance of comorbide substance use disorder.( Simon & Otto, 2004) and higher impulsivity. (Taylor & Hisrshfeld, 2007).

Because patients with GAD and comorbid disorders are lekely to accept more than impairment, disability, suicidality, poorer functioning and quality of life, fort he best upshot careful treatment choice must be chosen. The choice of drug(s) will depend on the severity of GAD; other comorbidity; an assessment of the agin effects; possible drug-drug interactions and other risks; and the need for an early onset of action

Advertisement

half dozen. Treating GAD

6.i. Outset-line pharmacotherapy approaches for GAD

The aims of the handling of GAD are to reduce the core symptoms of GAD (both the psychic and somatic), including restoration of sleep; to meliorate patient function and quality of life; to treat comorbid disorders—present at the time of diagnosis and those that appear over the long term; and to continue treatment for long enough to produce remission and, where possible, prevent relapse. Many patients with GAD practice non receive adequate treatment. Benzodiazepines, selective serotonine reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonine-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and cognitive therapy are consistantly effective as a offset-line handling. Dose ranges may need to be individualized according to the age, medical comorbidity, psychiatric comorbidity and other medications of the patients.

half-dozen.i.i. SSRIs

Several analyses have shown like efficacy among antidepressant agents in the management of GAD.(Baldwin & Anderson,2005) Of these, SSRIs and SNRIs are mostly preferred as first-line therapy, as the evidence supporting their efficacy is more robust, and they are usually better tolerated than the other classes of antidepressants. More recently, sertraline (Dahl & Ravindran, 2005) and paroxetine has been shown to exist efficacious in GAD,and citalopram has demonstrated efficacy in older patients (≥ 60 years of age) with GAD (Lenze&Mulsant, 2005).Because of the prevalence of sexual dysfunction has been estimated to be every bit high every bit 40% during handling with SSRIs, it is a common reason for treatment discontinuation.

The SSRIs escitalopram (10–twenty mg/24-hour interval) and paroxetine (20–l mg/twenty-four hours) have also been shown to be effective in the long-term handling of GAD. (Bielski & Bose, 2005) Relapse prevention studies have been reported for both drugs. (Allgulander & Florea, 2006; Stocchi & Nordera, 2003). Escitalopram reduced the take a chance of relapse compared with placebo during 24 to 72 weeks of randomized treatment following 12 weeks of open-label treatment. Similar results were found with paroxetine versus placebo in a shorter report.Essitalopram was also showen to exceed the effects of plasebo in an other study, and citalopram was effective in a geriatric population with GAD. (Goodman &Bose, 2005; Lenze & Mulsant,2005)

half-dozen.1.two. SNRIs (venlafaxine, duloksetin)

Venlafaxine, which affects both serotonin and norepinephrine systems, was the showtime drug that is approved fort he treatment of GAD and also has been showen to be effective in treating depression. Two placebo-controlled studies take demonstrated the efficacy of venlafaxine XR in GAD and accept provided that both the psychic and somatic manifestations of anxiety can exist controlled. Ane of these study compared venlafaxine (75 mg/da yor 150 mg/twenty-four hour period fixed dose) with buspirone (30 mg7day) treatment for 8 weeks in 365 patients with GAD. A significantly higher response rate as measured on the CGI was seen for venlafaxine 75 mg/twenty-four hours, compared with either buspirone or placebo later on week 1. The mean HAM-A broken-hearted mood and tension scores were significantly lower for both doses of venlafaxine XR at week 8 compared with placebo, however, the mean total HAM-A scores for all the treatment groups compared with placebo were not pregnant. (Davidson&Dupont, 1999)

In the second study the efficacy of venlafaxine XR (75 to 225 mg/day) assessed by the HAM-A anxiety subscale was statistically higher than placeboin 238 patients with GAD, over a 28-week maintenance flow.( Gelenberg & Lydiard, 2000) The results from these studies demonstrate the efficacy of venlafaxine XR in both the short- and long-term handling of GAD, but the optimal dose was not defined. In an 8-week study of 349 patients with GAD, venlafaxine at 225 mg/doses was plant to have more efficacy than placebo, in reducing HAM-A total scores. (Rickels & Pollack, 2000).

The efficacy of duloksetin, another SNRI, was approved in 2007 for the treatment of GAD. In two studies flexible doses of duloksetin (sixty-120 mg/day) was compared with placebo, found significantly greater improvement for both doses on HAM-A total scores.(Koponen & Allgulander, 2007). Duloxetine has also been shown to have long-term efficacy among patients with GAD who responded to 26 weeks of open-label treatment; administration of duloxetine for a farther 26 weeks reduced the risk of relapse compared with placebo. (Davidson & Wittchen,2008).

half-dozen.i.three. Benzodiazepines

Although benzodiazepines diazepam, alprazolam and lorazepam have showen efficacy in controlled trials and were ordinarily used in GAD; they must be used with caution because of modest abuse potential (Fraser, 1998) interactions with other drugs, including hypnotics sedating antidepressants, opiate analgesics, antihistamines, anticonvulsants and booze, particularly in older patients, falls, memory impaierment, incoordination, drowsiness and defoliation (Petrovic & Mariman 2003)

Although benzodiazepines accept a rapid onset of action on improving the core symptoms of GAD, they are not recommended as monotherapy for low, dysthymia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder, which commonly occur with GAD.(Ballenger &Davidson,2001; Kessler &Chiu,2005 ).

Benzodiazepines are generally recommended only for short-term use and are not recommended for kickoff-line long-term handling of GAD,( Swinson & Anthony 2006) although they have a office in the management of acute anxiety (Bandelow B, Zohar,2008; Ballenger JC, Davidson,2001) and may have a role in some cases in which somatic symptoms are more prominent than psychic symptoms.

6.1.4. Nonpharmacological treatments (cognitive behavioral therapy-CBT)

CBT has been used in GAD every bit a psychological handling strategy. However, comparisons between standard drugs for GAD and psychotherapy are lacking. Although CBT is the nearly constructive of the psychological treatments available for GAD, clinical response occurs in less than l% of people receiving this course of therapy (46% versus fourteen% for control), then unmet needs nevertheless remain (Hunot &Churchill R, 2007). When GAD is comorbid with depression, which is very common, pharmacotherapy with antidepressants is increasingly indicated (Ballenger et al., 2001).

6.2. Treatment comorbidity

Comorbidity is a critical factor that influence the treatment choice of GAD. Rickels and collegues institute that, for GAD patients with pregnant depressive symptoms, an antidepressant drug is more than useful than a benzodiazepine. In some other study,MDD patients with a comorbidity of GAD, venlafaxine XR was establish to be more than constructive than placebo and flouksetine.(Silverstone&Salinas, 2001). The data to back up appropriate choices in the comorbide GAD and bipolar disorder is lacking. Risk of mania with an antidepressant and run a risk of SUD about using benzodiazepines are the probable reasons for inadequate treatments.

vi.three. Treatment in children, adolescents and pregnancy

For children and adolescents, in that location are published studies of the treatment of GAD, evaluating the SSRIs sertraline, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine (Walkup & Labellarte 2001;Rynn & Siqueland 2001) and venlafaxine XR. (Sheehan & Keene 2008) These data propose that these agents may be effective in treating the symptoms of GAD in children and adolescents. The SSRIs are generally well tolerated in this population. Guidelines from the British Association for Psychopharmacology recommend that, in children, pharmacologic treatments should exist reserved for individuals who have non responded to psychological therapies and careful consideration of dosage is also necessary because of the adverse effects.

In addition, the risk of possible suicidal thoughts or behaviors should be considered and these potential adverse furnishings monitored when any antidepressants are administered in this historic period grouping.( FDA,2008).

In pregnancy nonpharmacologic treatment such as cognitive-behavioral therapy or interpersonal psychotherapy should be employed whenever possible. Simply it is every bit of import to discuss the risks of the untreated illness to both female parent and the infant. So if medication is required, the utilize of SSRIs in the everyman effective dosage for the minimum amount of fourth dimension is preferable in the beginning-line treatment considering of the data supporting their efficacy, minimal need for dose titration and favorable side effect profile. Paroxetine has been shown to be efficacious in GAD; nonetheless, the US Food and Drug Assistants (FDA) labeling for its use in pregnancy was reclassified to category D due to possible chance of congenital malformations, specially septal defects, when used during the first trimester of pregnancy. Newer antidepressants such as venlafaxine XR and mirtazapine are options for patients unresponsive or intoleran to SSRIs. Benzodiazepines should exist avoided considering of physiological dependence and withdrawal in the newborn.

Advertisement

seven. Other potentially effective agents

7.1. Bupropion

In a recent double-bullheaded, randomized study, which performed on a small-scale sample sizeof GAD patients, bupropion XL (150-300mg/day) compared with essitalopram (ten-20 mg/day) for 12 weeks.The main efficacy measures were the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) and the Hamilton Feet Rating Scale (HARS).Bupropion XL is found to exist demonstrated comparable anxiolytic efficacy to escitalopram in outpatients with GAD. These preliminary results needs to be improved farther.

7.2. Atypical antipsychotics

Several preliminary reports of monotherapy trials of quetiapine versus placebo accept described efficacy at doses in the range of 50–150 mg/mean solar day, (Chouinard & Ahokas A, 2008 ; Khan & Joyce 2008) but quetiapine cannot withal be recommended every bit a routine GAD treatment. However the apply of quetiapine could be considered after other classes of drugs have proved ineffective orwhen certain types of symptoms are present. In the studies by Chouinard, quality of life was measured using the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q)., and the highest score were seen with quetiapine XR 150 mg and paroxetine compared with placebo at week viii (Chouinard et al 2008). The efficacious application of quetiapine in MDD and GAD ranges from quetiapine monotherapy to adjunctive therapy with antidepressants for shortterm and maintenance treatment at a dose range betwixt 50–300 mg/mean solar day. Despite the oft benefi cial allaying effects of quetiapine on clinically relevant sleep issues in psychiatric patients, quetipaine is not recommended soley every bit a sleeping amanuensis. Overall, the nigh recently bachelor prove on quetiapine suggests that it can play a signifi cant office in the management of MDD and GAD.For olanzapine or risperidone, it is suggested that the results have been obtained in partialresponders to antidepressants rather than as monotherapy in all patients ( Pollack & Simon, 2006 ; Brawman & Knapp, 2005).

seven.iii. Antihistamines

Efficacy of the antihistamines in GAD was established in ii studies. (Llorca& Spadone, 2002; Lader &Scotto, 1998).The antihistamine hydroxyzine appears to have higher anxiolytic efficacy than placebo in controlled studies. Because of the side effects (sedation, anticholinergic effects), slow onset of action, and lack of efficacy for comorbid disorders, hydroxyzine was not recommended to be used every bit first-line therapy in some guidelines. (IPAP,2008; Bandelow& Zohar,2008).

vii.four. TCAs

The tricyclic drug imipramine is effective in GAD but is associated with the usual range of tricyclic antidepressant side furnishings, which limits its use for those who take not responded to an SSRI or SNRI.( Baldwin & Anderson,2005 ; Ballenger &Davidson 2001). Another possible 2d-line antidepressant includes trazodone (Rickels & Downing,1993).

7.5. Buspirone

The 5HT-1 receptor partial agonist buspirone is found to exist effective in the treatment of GAD co-ordinate to controlled studies (Goa &Ward 1986), but less effective than the benzodiazepines, (Laakmann & 1998) venlafaxine or hydroxyzine. Because of side effects like dizziness, drowsiness and nause, deadening onset of action lack of effectivity on comorbid atmospheric condition, buspiron is not recommended as showtime-line treatment for GAD. (Bandelow & Zohar,2008)

7.6. α2δ Ca ++ channel modulators, pregabaline

The α2δ Ca++ aqueduct modulator pregabalin was shown to have greater efficacy than placebo, nearly equal to benzodiazepines and venlafaxine both in the offset week and maintenance of 6 months in several placebo controlled studies (Pande & Crockatt,2003; Montgomery,2006; Montgomery&Tobias, 2006; Owen,2007). The long-term efficacy of pregabalin has also been demonstrated in patients with GAD that it reduced the gamble of relapse compared with placebo, during 24 weeks of randomized treatment following 8 weeks of open-characterization treatment. (Feltner & Wittchen, 2008)

7.7. Tiagabine

The selective GABA reuptake inhibitor tiagabin has been studied in 3 large placebo-controlled trials in 1830 patients with GAD and no significant difference from placebo was showen, moreover side effects were too high that %47 of patients were drop out. It seem hard to justify the use of tiagabine for GAD. (Pollack& Tiller,2008)

7.8. Agomelatine

Agomelatine a novel amanuensis that acts on melatonergic and serotonergic receptors was assessed on a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on one hundred 20-i patients with GAD with no comorbid disorders.The patients were randomized to agomelatine (25-l mg/d) or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, whereas secondary event measures included the Clinical Global Impression scales. Analysis of covariance of change in the last Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale total score from baseline demonstrated significant superiority of agomelatine 25 to 50 mg equally compared with placebo.Safety analysis indicated that agomelatine was tolerated every bit well as placebo and was devoid of discontinuation emergent symptoms. This study suggests that agomelatine is effective in the treatment of GAD and is well tolerated (Stein & Ahokas,2008).

Advertisement

eight. Adequate and poor response to pharmacotherapy: Switching medication and augmentation strategies

In about studies, response is unremarkably divers equally a ≥l% reduction on the commonly used standard scales. This definition is also arbitrary, because that cannot be applied for all disorders. Assessment of changes on disease-specific rating scales and measures of global affliction severity and improvement, social, occupational, and academic functioning, and quality of life should be performed. Remission implies not just the relief of symptoms but also restoration of patients to their premorbid high level of functioning, including resumption of family, social, and work-related role.

Treatment resistance patient could be defined as a patient who had a standard handling for a minimum of 6 weeks without showing response. Earlier a treatment is considered every bit failure it should exist ascertained that the diagnosis is correct, the patient is compliant with therapy, the dosage prescribed is therapeutic and there has been an adequate trial menstruation. Comorbid personality disorders such as borderline personality disorder, depression and substance abuse may be associated with poor consequence. Coocurrence of GAD with medical disorders such as heart affliction and gastrointestinal and chronic pain disorders causes an extended clinical course and poorer consequence than patients with GAD alone (Harter et al., 2003; Bowen et al., 2000; Mc Williams et al., 2003; Roy-Byrne et al., 2008).

If partial response is not seen after iv–half dozen weeks, there is all the same a hazard that the patient will respond after some other 4–6 weeks of therapy with increased dose. When initial treatment fails,the psychiatrist can either augment the current treatment by adding some other agent (in the case of pharmacotherapy) or some other modality (i.e., add together CBT if the patient is already receiving pharmacotherapy, or add pharmacotherapy if the patient is already receiving CBT), or they can make up one's mind to switch to a different medication or therapeutic modality. Augmentation is generally a reasonable approach if some meaning benefits were observed with the original handling. On the other mitt, if the original treatment failed to provide any meaning alleviation of the patient'south symptoms, a switch in treatment may be more useful. Treatment resistance are normally based on clinical judgment, "augmentation and switching studies" are lacking. Low doses of risperidone take been shown to improve in feet symptoms when added to initial treatment in patients who had non responded to first-line anxiolytic drugs. (Brawman & Knapp,2005) A study of quetiapine augmentation of paroxetine did not provide testify as an augmenting amanuensis in GAD.(Simon & Connor,2008). Olanzapine has shown similar augmentation effects when added to fluoxetine in patients with refractory GAD, although this efficacy was accomplished at the expense of substantial weight gain.(Pollack & Simon, 2006). Other augmentation strategies might include addition of a benzodiazepine or other GABAergic drug to an antidepressant. Augmentation of medication with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has not been studied meaningfully in GAD, and its do good however awaits adequate evaluation.

Advertisement

9. Maintenance treatment

Because GAD is a chronic illness, maintenance handling is required and it is showen that stopping astute treatment with anxiolytic after 4 weeks, %60 to lxxx patients led to relapse inside a year. (Rickels & Schweizer, 1990). In a study, fifty-fifty later 6 months of buspirone treatment for GAD, stopping treatment led to relapse of %25 inside a month. (Rickels & Schweizer, 1988) After treating with essitalopram for 12 weeks, the patients randomized to essitalopram or placebo up to 76 weeks and the relapse rates were %xix and %56, respectively. (Allgulander & Florea, 2006). Probable, Later 8 weeks of treatment with paroxetine, the patients were randomized for 24 weeks and the relapse rates were%x,9 and %39,9. (Davidson & Wittchen, 2008). GAD requires long-term treatment that remission tin can accept several moths and stopping medication increases the gamble of relapse within the starting time year of initiating treatment.

Advertisement

ten. Conclusion

It is recommended that the first-line treatment for patients with GAD should consist of an antidepressant, such as SSRI (paroxetine and essitalopram) or SNRI (venlafaxine and duloksetine). On the other hand they take efficacy limitations, including lack of response, lack of full remission, chance of relapse and agin furnishings. This ways that there is a demand for alternative treatment options. Following the outset-line treatment in case of inappropriate response; 1) increasing the dose of the SSRI/SNRI, 2)switching to a same class or different class amanuensis or iii) augmentation therapy may be considered.The strategy of augmentation SSRIs/SNRIs with atypical antipsychotics may be useful in improving the rates of remission but randomized controlled studies are needed.

References

  1. i. Allgulander C. Florea I. Huusom A. Thousand. Prevention of relapse in generalized anxiety disorder by escitalopram treatmentInt J Neuropsychopharmacol.2006 nine v 495 505
  2. 2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Transmission of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Washington, DC:American Psyciatric Association;1994
  3. 3. American Psychiatric Clan. Diagnostic and Statistical Transmission of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition.Text revised. Washington, DC:American Psyciatric Association;2000
  4. 4. Baldwin DS, Anderson IM, Nutt DJ, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological handling of anxiety disorders: recommendations from the British Association for PsychopharmacologyJ Psychopharmacol.2005 19 6 567 596
  5. 5. Ballenger JC. Overview of dissimilar pharmacotherapies for attaining remission in generalized anxiety disorder.J Clin Psychiatry2001Suppl. 19;eleven nine
  6. half-dozen. Ballenger J. C. Davidson J. R. T. Lecrubier Y. et al. Consensus statement on generalized feet disorder from the international consensus group on depression and feet. J Clin Psychiatry.2001suppl 11):53 EOF 8 EOF
  7. 7. Bandelow B. Rüther E. Treatment resistant panic disorder. CNS Spectr.2004 725 EOF 39 EOF
  8. viii. Bandelow B. Zohar J. Hollander Due east. et al. World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for the Pharmacological Treatment of Feet, Obsessive-Compulsive and Post-Traumatic Stress DisordersOutset Revision. Earth J Biol Psychiatry.2008 9 4 248 312
  9. 9. Bielski R. J. Bose A. Chang C. C. A. double-bullheaded comparison. of escitalopram. paroxetine in. the long-term. treatment of. generalized anxiety. disorder Ann Clin Psychiatry.2005 17 2 65 69
  10. x. Brawman-Mintzer O. Knapp R. Grand. Nietert P. J. Adjunctive risperidone in generalized anxiety disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.J Clin Psychiatry.2005 66 10 1321 1325
  11. eleven. Bruce SE, Yonkers KA, Otto MW, et al. Influence of psychiatric comorbidity on recovery and recurrence in generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, and panic disorder:a 12 year prospective written report.Am J Psychiatry.2005 162 1179 1187
  12. 12. Bystritsky A. Kerwin 50. JD Feusner Vapnik. T. A. Airplane pilot Controlled. Trial of. Bupropion X. L. Versus Escitalopram. in Generalized. Anxiety Disorder. Psychopharmacol Bull.2008 41 1 46 51
  13. 13. Charney DS.Psycobiological mechanisms of resilience and vulnerability: implications for successful adaptation to farthermost stres. Am J Psychiatry.2004 161 two 195 216
  14. 14. Chouinard G. Ahokas A. Bandelow B. et al. Extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) in one case-daily monotherapy in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Presented at the 27th Almanac Meeting of the Feet Disorders Association of America; March6 9 2008St Louis, MO.
  15. 15. Craske M. G. MJ Edlund Sullivan. G. Roy-Byrne P. P. Sherbourne C. D. As Bystritsky One thousand. B. Perceived unmet need for mental wellness and barriers to amidst care patients with panic disorder. Psychiatric Services2005 56 988 94
  16. xvi. AA Dahl Ravindran. A. Allgulander C. et al. Sertraline in generalized anxiety disorder: efficacy in treating the psychic and somatic anxiety factors Acta Psychiatr Scand.2005 111 6 429 435
  17. 17. Davidson J. T. R. Dupont R. L. Hedges D. et al. Efficacy safety. tolerability of. venlafaxine extended. release buspirone in. outpatients with. generalized anxiety. disorder JTR, Dupont RL, Hedges D, et al.Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of venlafaxine extended release and buspirone in outpatients with generalized feet disorder.J Clin Psychiatry1999 60 528 535
  18. 18. Davidson JR, Wittchen HU, Llorca PM, et al. Duloxetine treatment for relapse prevention in adults with generalized feet disorder: a double-blind placebo-controlled trialEur Neuropsychopharmacol.2008 18 ix 673 681
  19. 19. Demyttenaere K. Bruffaerts R. Posada-Villa J. et al. Prevalence severity. unmet need. for handling. of mental. disorders in. the World. Health Arrangement. World Mental. Wellness . West. M. H. Surveys Journal of the American Medical Clan2004 291 2581 90
  20. 20. Dilbaz North. Turkish Anxiety Sensitivity Index: Psychometric properties. Presented at National Anxiety Disorders Congress in Tunusia, in2005
  21. 21. Fava Yard. Rush A. J. Alpert J. E. et al. Deviation in handling outcome in patients with anxious versus nonanxious depression: a STAR*D written report. Am J Psychitry.2008 165 three 342 351
  22. 22. Feltner D. Wittchen H. U. Kavoussi R. et al. Long-term efficacy of pregabalin in generalized anxiety disorderInt Clin Psychopharmacol.2008 23 1 18 28
  23. 23. Fraser AD. Use and abuse of the benzodiazepines.Ther Drug Monit.1998 xx 5 481 489
  24. 24. Food and Drug Administration.Revisions to product labeling: suicidality and antidepressant drugs;2007Accessed November 2008.
  25. 25. Gelenberg AJ, Lydiard RB, Rudolph RL, et al. Efficacy of venlafaxine extended-release capsules in nondepressed outpatients with generalized feet disorder: a vi-month randomized controlled trial.JAMA2000 283 3082 3088
  26. 26. Goa K. L. Ward A. Buspirone a. preliminary review. of its. pharmacological properties. therapeutic efficacy. as an anxiolytic. Drugs1986 32 2 114 129
  27. 27. Gorman JM, Hirschfeld RM. Ninan PT. New developments in the neurobiological footing of anxiety disorders.Psychopharmacol Bull2002Suppl. 2;49 67
  28. 28. Goodman Westward. K. Bose A. Wang Q. Handling of generalized anxiety disorder with escitalopram: pooled results from double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.J Affect Disord.2005 161 EOF vii EOF
  29. 29. Goodwin RD, Gorman JM. Psychopharmacologic treatment of generalized feet disorder and the risk of major depression.Am J Psychiatry.2002 159 11 1935 1937
  30. 30. Grant BF, Hasin DS, Stinson FS, et al. Prevalence, correlates, comorbidity, and comperative disability of DSM-Iv generalized anxiety disorder in the USA:results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Weather condition.Psychol Med.2005 35 12 747 759
  31. 31. Habib KE, Gilt Pw, Chrousos GP. Neuroendocrinology of stres.Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am.2001 30 3 695 728
  32. 32. Hettema JM.What is the genetic human relationship between anxiety and depression? Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet.2008 148 2 140 146
  33. 33. Hettema JM, An SS, Neale MC, et al. Association betwixt glutamic acid decarboxylase genes and anxiety disorders, major low, and neuroticism.Mol Psychiatry.2006 11 8 752 762Correction in 2006;11(8):794.
  34. 34. Hoffman DL, Dukes EM, Wittchen HU.Human and economic brunt of generalized feet disorder. Depress Anxiety.2008 25 1 72 90
  35. 35. Hunot 5. Churchill R. Silva de Lima. K. et al. Psychological therapies for generalised anxiety disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2007CD001848
  36. 36. International Psychopharmacology Algorithm Project. IPAP Full general Feet Disorder (GAD) Algorithm Notes. http://www.ipap.org/gad/index.php.Accessed November2008
  37. 37. Khan A. Joyce Chiliad. Eggens I. et al. Extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) monotherapy in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Presented at the 27th Almanac Meeting of the Feet Disorders Association of America; March6 9 2008St Louis, MO.
  38. 38. Kendler K. South. Gardner C. O. Gatz Chiliad. et al. The sources of co-morbidity betwixt major depression and generalized anxiety disorder in a Swedish national twin sample. Psychol Med.2007 37 3 453 462
  39. 39. Kessler R. C. Brandenburg N. Lane M. et al. Rethinking the elapsing requirement for generalized feet disorder: evidence from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Psychol Med.2005 35 7 1073 1082
  40. 40. Kessler R. C. Berglund P. Demler O. Jin R. EE Walters Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-4 disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.Arch Gen Psychiatry.2005 62 593 602
  41. 41. Kessler R. C. Chiu West. T. Demler O. et al. Prevalence severity. comorbidity of. 12-month-I D. S. Yard. disorders V. in the. National Comorbidity. Survey Replication. Curvation Gen Psychiatry.2005 62 6 617 627
  42. 42. Koponen H. Allgulander C. Erikson J. et al. Efficacy of duloksetine fort he treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: implications for primary care phsicians. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry.2007 9 2 100 107
  43. 43. Laakmann K. Schule C. Lorkowski Thousand. et al. Buspirone and lorazepam in the handling of generalized anxiety disorder in outpatients. Psychopharmacology (Berl).1998 136 4 357 366
  44. 44. Lader M. Scotto J. C. A. multicentre double-blind. comparison of. hydroxyzine buspirone. placebo in. patients with. generalized anxiety. disorder Psychopharmacology (Berl):1998 139 4 402 406
  45. 45. Lenze EJ, Mulsant BH, Shear MK, et al.Efficacy and tolerability of citalopram in the treatment of belatedly-life anxiety disorder:results from an 8-calendar week randomized, placebo-controllled trial. Am J Psychiatry.2005 162 1 146 150
  46. 46. Llorca P. K. Spadone C. Sol O,et. al Efficacy and safety of hydroxyzine in the treatment of generalized feet disorder: a 3-month double-blind study. J Clin Psychiatry.2002 63 eleven 102 1027
  47. 47. Mathew S. J. Mao X. JD Coplan et. al Dorsolateral prefrontal cortical pathology in generalized feet disorder:a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging study. Am J Psychiatry.2004 161 half-dozen 1119 1121
  48. 48. Monk CS, Nelson EE, McClure EB, et al.Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex activation and attentional bias in response to angry faces in adolescents with generalized feet disorder. Am J Psychiatry.2006 163 6 1091 1097
  49. 49. Montgomery SA.Pregabaline fort he handling of generalized anxiety disorder. Expert Opin Pharmacother.2006 vii xv 2139 2154
  50. fifty. Montgomery S. A. Tobias K. Zomberg 1000. L. et al. Efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder:a 6- week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparing of pregabalin and venlafaxine. J Clin Psychiatry.2006 67 5 771 782
  51. 51. Owen RT. Pregabalin:its efficacy, prophylactic and tolerability profile in generalized feet disorder.Drugs Today (Barc).2007 43 9 601 610
  52. 52. Pallanti S. Hollander E. Bienstock C. et al. Treatment not-response in OCD: methodological problems and operational definitions. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol.2002 5 181 191
  53. 53. Pallanti S. Quercioli L. Treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive. disorder methodological. bug operational. definitions therapeutic lines. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry.2006 30 3 400 412
  54. 54. Pande Ac, Crockatt JG, Feltner DE, et al.Pregabaline in generalized anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled trial.Am J Psychiatry.2003 160 iii 533 540
  55. 55. Petrovic K. Mariman A. Warie H. et al. Is there a rationale for prescription of benzodiazepines in the elderly? review of the literature. Acta Clin Belg.2003 58 1 27 36
  56. 56. Pollack MH, Simon NM, Zalta AK, et al.Olanzapine augmentation of fluoxetine for refractory generalized anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled written report. Biol Psychiatry.2006 59 3 211 215PubMeddoi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.07.005.
  57. 57. Pollack G. H. Tiller J. Xie F. et al. Tiagabine in adult patients with generalized anxiety disorder: results from 3 randomized, double-bullheaded, placebo-controlled, parallel-grouping studies. J Clin Psychopharmacol.2008 28 iii 308 316
  58. 58. Pollack MH, Simon NM, Zalta AK, et al.Olanzapine augmentation of fluoxetine for refractory generalized feet disorder: a placebo-controlled written report.Biol Psychiatry.2006 59 3 211 215
  59. 59. Rickels K. Pollack M. H. Sheehan D. V. et al. Efficacy of extended-release venlafaxine in nondepressed outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder. Am J Psychiatry.2000 157 six 968 974
  60. 60. Rickels Yard. Downing R. Schweizer Due east. et al. Antidepressants for the handling of generalized anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled comparing of imipramine, trazodone, and diazepam. Curvation Gen Psychiatry.1993 l xi 884 895
  61. 61. Rickels K. Schiweizer E. The clinical grade and long-term management of generalized anxiety disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol.1990suppl 3):101S-110S.
  62. 62. Rickels K. Schiweizer Due east. Csanalosi I. et al. Long-term handling of feet and risk of withdrawal. Prospective comparison of clorazepate and buspirone. Curvation Gen Psychiatry.1988 45 5 444 450
  63. 63. MA Rynn Siqueland. L. Rickels One thousand. Placebo-controlled trial of sertraline in the treatment of children with generalized feet disorder. Am J Psychiatry.2001 158 12 2008 2014
  64. 64. Sheehan D. V. MS Keene Eaddy. M. et al. Differences in medication adherence and healthcare resource utilization patterns: older versus newer antidepressant agents in patients with low and/or anxiety disorders. CNS Drugs.2008 22 eleven 963 973
  65. 65. Silverstone P. H. Salinas eastward. Efficacy of venlafaxine extended release in patients with major depressive disorder nd comorbid generalized anxiety disorder. J Clin Psychiatry.2001
  66. 66. Simon NM, Connor KM, LeBeau RT, et al.Quetiapine augmentation of paroxetine CR for the treatment of refractory generalized anxiety disorder: preliminary findings. Psychopharmacology (Berl).2008 197 4 675 681
  67. 67. Simon NM, Otto MW, Wisniewski SR, et al.Anxiety disorder comorbidity in bipolar disorder patients: data from the starting time 500 participants in the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD). Am J Psychiatry.2004 161 12 2222 2229
  68. 68. Stein D. J. AA Ahokas de Bodinat. C. Efficacy of agomelatine in generalized feet disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychopharmacol.2008October;28 5 561 vi
  69. 69. Stocchi F. Nordera Grand. Jokinen R. H. et al. Efficacy and tolerability of paroxetine for the long-term treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. J Clin Psychiatry.2003 64 3 250 258
  70. 70. Swinson R. P. MM Anthony Bleau. P. et al. Clinical exercise. guidelines management. of anxiety. disorders Can J Psychiatry.2006suppl 2):9S-91S
  71. 71. Taylor CT, Hirshfeld-Becker DR, Ostacher MJ, et al.Anxiety is associated with impulsivity in bipolar disorder. J Anxiety Disord.2007 22 v 868 876
  72. 72. Walkup JT, Labellarte MJ, Riddle MA, et al, for the Inquiry Unit on Pediatric Psychopharmacology Anxiety Study Group.Fluvoxamine for the treatment of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. N Engl J Med.2001 344 17 1279 1285
  73. 73. Wittchen H. U. Hoyer J. Generalized anxiety. disorder nature. course J. Clin Psychiatry. 2001suppl eleven):15-19.
  74. 74. Wittchen-U H. Jacobi F. Size and burden of mental disorders in Europe: a critical review and appraisal of 27 studies. European Neuropsychopharmacology2005 15 4 357 67
  75. 75. Yonkers One thousand. A. Dyck I. R. Warshaw Yard. et al. Factors predicting the clinical sourse of generalized anxiety disorder. Br J Psychiatry.2000 176 544 549
  76. 76. Yonkers KA, Bruce SE, Dyck IR, et al. Chronicity, relapse and illness:form of panic disorder, social phobia and generalized anxiety disorder: findings in men and women from viii years of follow-up.Depress Anxiety.2003 17 3 173 179

Written Past

Nesrin Dilbaz, Serçin Yalcın Cavus and Aslı Enez Darcin

Submitted: November 25th, 2010 Reviewed: April 12th, 2011 Published: September twelfth, 2011

kirkpatrickprimses.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/19368

0 Response to "Gabitril as Anxiety Treatment Peer Reviewed Trials Report"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel